↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008832.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurits W Gosler, Mark Testroote, JW Morrenhof, Heinrich MJ Janzing

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 144 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 34 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,341,817
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,428
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,325
of 247,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#169
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.