↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008832.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurits W Gosler, Mark Testroote, JW Morrenhof, Heinrich MJ Janzing

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,265
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,103
of 257,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#177
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.