↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing blood loss during the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing blood loss during the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001421.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre PL Martin-Hirsch, Andrew Bryant

Abstract

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is the most common pre-malignant lesion. Surgical treatments for CIN are commonly associated with blood loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 13%
Other 14 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 52 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 53 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,799,182
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,126
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,259
of 320,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#185
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.