| Title |
Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004375.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jim Jamison, Suzanne Maguire, John McCann |
| Abstract |
Management of the neurogenic bladder has the primary objectives of maintaining continence, ensuring low bladder pressure (to avoid renal damage) and avoiding or minimising infection. Options include intermittent urethral catheterisation, indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheterisation, timed voiding, use of external catheter (for men), drug treatment, augmentation cystoplasty and urinary diversion. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,400,548
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,918
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,972
of 316,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.