↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the symptoms and signs resulting from jellyfish stings

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for the symptoms and signs resulting from jellyfish stings
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009688.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li, Richard G McGee, Geoffrey K Isbister, Angela C Webster

Abstract

Jellyfish envenomations are common amongst temperate coastal regions and vary in severity depending on the species. Stings result in a variety of symptoms and signs, including pain, dermatological reactions and, in some species, Irukandji syndrome (including abdominal/back/chest pain, tachycardia, hypertension, sweating, piloerection, agitation and sometimes cardiac complications). Many treatments have been suggested for the symptoms and signs of jellyfish stings. However, it is unclear which interventions are most effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Researcher 16 9%
Unspecified 9 5%
Other 41 24%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Unspecified 9 5%
Psychology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 50 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#660,031
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,340
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,578
of 306,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.