↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002128.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Rees, Mariana Dyakova, Nicola Wilson, Kirsten Ward, Margaret Thorogood, Eric Brunner, Rees K, Dyakova M, Wilson N, Ward K, Thorogood M, Brunner E, Rees, Karen, Dyakova, Mariana, Wilson, Nicola, Ward, Kirsten, Thorogood, Margaret, Brunner, Eric

Abstract

Changes in population diet are likely to reduce cardiovascular disease and cancer, but the effect of dietary advice is uncertain. This review is an update of a previous review published in 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 446 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 17%
Student > Bachelor 74 16%
Researcher 69 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 12%
Other 25 5%
Other 90 20%
Unknown 72 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 175 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 6%
Social Sciences 22 5%
Psychology 22 5%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 89 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,335,937
of 17,795,994 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,030
of 11,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,258
of 274,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,795,994 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.