↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative interventions for treating work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
Title
Conservative interventions for treating work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008742.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arianne P Verhagen, Sita MA Bierma-Zeinstra, Alex Burdorf, Siobhán M Stynes, Henrica CW de Vet, Bart W Koes

Abstract

Work-related upper limb disorder (WRULD), repetitive strain injury (RSI), occupational overuse syndrome (OOS) and work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder (CANS) are the most frequently used umbrella terms for disorders that develop as a result of repetitive movements, awkward postures and impact of external forces such as those associated with operating vibrating tools. Work-related CANS, which is the term we use in this review, severely hampers the working population.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 433 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 92 21%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Student > Postgraduate 40 9%
Researcher 30 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 7%
Other 77 18%
Unknown 113 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 140 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 15%
Psychology 25 6%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Sports and Recreations 13 3%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 130 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,416,444
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,255
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,110
of 307,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.