↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for educating children who are at risk of asthma‐related emergency department attendance

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for educating children who are at risk of asthma‐related emergency department attendance
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001290.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Boyd, Toby J Lasserson, Michael C McKean, Peter G Gibson, Francine M Ducharme, Michelle Haby

Abstract

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood illness and is a leading cause for paediatric admission to hospital. Asthma management for children results in substantial costs. There is evidence to suggest that hospital admissions could be reduced with effective education for parents and children about asthma and its management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 282 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Other 19 7%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 84 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Psychology 14 5%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 93 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,945,856
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,205
of 13,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,682
of 107,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.