↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for educating children who are at risk of asthma-related emergency department attendance

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for educating children who are at risk of asthma-related emergency department attendance
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001290.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Boyd, Toby J Lasserson, Michael C McKean, Peter G Gibson, Francine M Ducharme, Michelle Haby

Abstract

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood illness and is a leading cause for paediatric admission to hospital. Asthma management for children results in substantial costs. There is evidence to suggest that hospital admissions could be reduced with effective education for parents and children about asthma and its management.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 206 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Other 16 7%
Other 52 24%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 13%
Psychology 11 5%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 37 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,214,813
of 17,360,236 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,150
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,703
of 273,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,360,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.