↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chest radiographs for acute lower respiratory tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Chest radiographs for acute lower respiratory tract infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009119.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Millicent Y Cao, Joleen P Choy, Lakshmi Narayana Mohanakrishnan, Roger F Bain, Mieke L van Driel

Abstract

Acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) (e.g. pneumonia) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and management focuses on early treatment. Chest radiographs (X-rays) are one of the commonly used strategies. Although radiological facilities are easily accessible in high-income countries, access can be limited in low-income countries. The efficacy of chest radiographs as a tool in the management of acute LRTIs has not been determined. Although chest radiographs are used for both diagnosis and management, our review focuses only on management.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 224 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 16%
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 50 22%
Unknown 50 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 61 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#772,364
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,997
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,793
of 273,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.