The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Computer‐assisted surgery for knee ligament reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007601.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent Eggerding, Max Reijman, Rob JPM Scholten, Jan AN Verhaar, Duncan E Meuffels |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 214 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 79 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 92 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2017.
All research outputs
#23,475,307
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,855
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,506
of 250,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#232
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.