↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
Title
Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006569.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priya Khanna, Tao Suo, Katja Komossa, Huaixing Ma, Christine Rummel-Kluge, Hany G El-Sayeh, Stefan Leucht, Jun Xia

Abstract

In most western industrialised countries, second generation (atypical) antipsychotics are recommended as first-line drug treatments for people with schizophrenia. In this review, we specifically examine how the efficacy and tolerability of one such agent - aripiprazole - differs from that of other comparable second generation antipsychotics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 375 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 17%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Researcher 44 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 11%
Other 25 6%
Other 90 23%
Unknown 71 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 36%
Psychology 38 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 85 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#975,571
of 21,181,573 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,294
of 12,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,060
of 303,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,181,573 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.