↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003344.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mical Paul, Adi Lador, Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg, Leonard Leibovici

Abstract

Optimal antibiotic treatment for sepsis is imperative. Combining a beta lactam antibiotic with an aminoglycoside antibiotic may provide certain advantages over beta lactam monotherapy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 370 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 13%
Student > Master 49 13%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 9%
Student > Postgraduate 34 9%
Other 79 21%
Unknown 92 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 173 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 3%
Other 49 13%
Unknown 99 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,364,830
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,117
of 12,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,105
of 308,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.