↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Routine preoperative medical testing for cataract surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Routine preoperative medical testing for cataract surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007293.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Keay, Kristina Lindsley, James Tielsch, Joanne Katz, Oliver Schein

Abstract

Cataract surgery is practiced widely and substantial resources are committed to an increasing cataract surgical rate in developing countries. With the current volume of cataract surgery and the increases in the future, it is critical to optimize the safety and cost-effectiveness of this procedure. Most cataracts are performed on older individuals with correspondingly high systemic and ocular comorbidities. It is likely that routine preoperative medical testing will detect medical conditions, but it is questionable whether these conditions should preclude individuals from cataract surgery or change their perioperative management.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 24 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,854,912
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,124
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,232
of 156,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.