| Title |
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treating acute surgical and traumatic wounds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008059.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Eskes, Hester Vermeulen, Cees Lucas, Dirk T Ubbink |
| Abstract |
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is used as a treatment for acute wounds (such as those arising from surgery and trauma). However, the effects of HBOT on wound healing are unclear. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Andorra | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 22% |
| Unknown | 62 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 40% |
| Unspecified | 22 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 69 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,759,134
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,282
of 12,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,461
of 310,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.