↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treating acute surgical and traumatic wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treating acute surgical and traumatic wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008059.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Eskes, Hester Vermeulen, Cees Lucas, Dirk T Ubbink

Abstract

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is used as a treatment for acute wounds (such as those arising from surgery and trauma). However, the effects of HBOT on wound healing are unclear. 

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Andorra 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 163 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 41 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,396,114
of 17,609,679 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,011
of 11,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,971
of 275,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,609,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.