↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treating acute surgical and traumatic wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treating acute surgical and traumatic wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008059.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Eskes, Hester Vermeulen, Cees Lucas, Dirk T Ubbink

Abstract

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is used as a treatment for acute wounds (such as those arising from surgery and trauma). However, the effects of HBOT on wound healing are unclear. 

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Andorra 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 200 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Master 26 13%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Other 12 6%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 50 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 55 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,806,661
of 20,378,425 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,868
of 12,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,379
of 296,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,378,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.