↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for (sub)acute non-specific low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for (sub)acute non-specific low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009265
Authors

Andrea D Furlan, Fatemeh Yazdi, Alexander Tsertsvadze, Lixing Lao, Karen Sherman, Carlo Ammendolia, Ellen Wang, Byung-Cheul Shin, Ikuro Wakayama, Maurits W van Tulder

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Psychology 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 32 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,697,480
of 21,366,128 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,512
of 12,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,914
of 287,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#197
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,366,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.