↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sling exercise therapy for chronic low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Sling exercise therapy for chronic low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010689
Authors

Huifang Liu, Ke Yao, Jingjing Zhang, Li, Taixiang Wu, Jens Ivar Brox, Chengqi He

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 5 7%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 15 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,609,310
of 17,364,317 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,107
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,762
of 276,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#198
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,364,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.