↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sling exercise therapy for chronic low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Sling exercise therapy for chronic low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010689
Authors

Huifang Liu, Ke Yao, Jingjing Zhang, Li, Taixiang Wu, Jens Ivar Brox, Chengqi He

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Psychology 6 8%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,004
of 12,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,188
of 200,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.