Sling exercise therapy for chronic low-back pain
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Huifang Liu, Ke Yao, Jingjing Zhang, Li, Taixiang Wu, Jens Ivar Brox, Chengqi He
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||17||22%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||10||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||8||11%|
|Student > Postgraduate||6||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||26||34%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||7||9%|
|Sports and Recreations||5||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 200,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.