↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Insulin for glycaemic control in acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Insulin for glycaemic control in acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005346.pub4
Pubmed ID
24453023
Authors

M Fernanda Bellolio, Rachel M Gilmore, Latha Ganti

Abstract

People with hyperglycaemia concomitant with an acute stroke have greater mortality, stroke severity, and functional impairment when compared with those with normoglycaemia at stroke presentation. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2011.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 257 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 16%
Student > Master 34 13%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 69 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Psychology 9 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 84 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,831,333
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,795
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,448
of 305,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#200
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.