↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Addition to inhaled corticosteroids of long-acting beta2-agonists versus anti-leukotrienes for chronic asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
347 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Addition to inhaled corticosteroids of long-acting beta2-agonists versus anti-leukotrienes for chronic asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003137.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan, Francine M Ducharme

Abstract

Asthma patients who continue to experience symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) represent a management challenge. Long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) and anti-leukotrienes (LTRA) are two treatment options that could be considered as add-on therapy to ICS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 342 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Researcher 29 8%
Unspecified 28 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Other 90 26%
Unknown 88 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 12%
Unspecified 28 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 95 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,182,951
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,692
of 12,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,410
of 306,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.