↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment of Kaposi sarcoma in children with HIV‐1 infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of Kaposi sarcoma in children with HIV‐1 infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009826.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Anglemyer, Anurag K Agrawal, George W Rutherford

Abstract

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) remains the second most frequently diagnosed HIV-related malignancy (HRM) worldwide and most common HRM in sub-Saharan Africa where HIV is most prevalent and human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), the precipitating agent for the development of KS, is endemic. The majority of KS patients would likely benefit from systemic chemotherapy in addition to the initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, as paediatric staging and treatment criteria are not readily available, there are no uniform treatment criteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 158 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 21%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 12 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 44 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Psychology 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 48 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,303,162
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,599
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,140
of 323,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.