Title |
Treatment of Kaposi sarcoma in children with HIV-1 infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009826.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Anglemyer, Anurag K Agrawal, George W Rutherford |
Abstract |
Kaposi sarcoma (KS) remains the second most frequently diagnosed HIV-related malignancy (HRM) worldwide and most common HRM in sub-Saharan Africa where HIV is most prevalent and human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), the precipitating agent for the development of KS, is endemic. The majority of KS patients would likely benefit from systemic chemotherapy in addition to the initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, as paediatric staging and treatment criteria are not readily available, there are no uniform treatment criteria. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 32 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Researcher | 12 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 16% |
Unknown | 39 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 13% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 42 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,435,788
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,271
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,412
of 307,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.