↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care

Overview of attention for article published in this source, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009780.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbui, Corrado, Girlanda, Francesca, Ay, Esra, Cipriani, Andrea, Becker, Thomas, Koesters, Markus

Abstract

A huge gap exists between the production of evidence and its take-up in clinical practice settings. To fill this gap, treatment guidelines, based on explicit assessments of the evidence base, are commonly employed in several fields of medicine, including schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. It remains unclear, however, whether treatment guidelines have any impact on provider performance and patient outcomes, and how implementation should be conducted to maximise benefit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 144 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 39 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 27%
Psychology 29 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 39 26%