↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009780.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbui C, Girlanda F, Ay E, Cipriani A, Becker T, Koesters M

Abstract

A huge gap exists between the production of evidence and its take-up in clinical practice settings. To fill this gap, treatment guidelines, based on explicit assessments of the evidence base, are commonly employed in several fields of medicine, including schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. It remains unclear, however, whether treatment guidelines have any impact on provider performance and patient outcomes, and how implementation should be conducted to maximise benefit.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 30%
Psychology 26 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 17 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,264,838
of 15,405,287 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,436
of 11,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,326
of 255,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,405,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.