↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dexmedetomidine for the management of awake fibreoptic intubation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Dexmedetomidine for the management of awake fibreoptic intubation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009798.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xing-Ying He, Jian-Ping Cao, Qian He, Xue Y Shi

Abstract

Awake fibreoptic intubation (AFOI) frequently requires sedation, anxiolysis and relief of discomfort without impairing ventilation and depressing cardiovascular function. The goal is to allow the patient to be responsive and co-operative. Medications such as fentanyl, remifentanil, midazolam and propofol have been reported to assist AFOI; however,these agents are associated with cardiovascular or respiratory adverse effects. Dexmedetomidine has been proposed as an alternative to facilitate AFOI.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 35 28%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 53%
Psychology 10 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 29 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,033,707
of 18,187,474 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,371
of 11,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,733
of 267,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,187,474 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.