↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dexmedetomidine for the management of awake fibreoptic intubation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Dexmedetomidine for the management of awake fibreoptic intubation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009798.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xing-Ying He, Jian-Ping Cao, Qian He, Xue Y Shi

Abstract

Awake fibreoptic intubation (AFOI) frequently requires sedation, anxiolysis and relief of discomfort without impairing ventilation and depressing cardiovascular function. The goal is to allow the patient to be responsive and co-operative. Medications such as fentanyl, remifentanil, midazolam and propofol have been reported to assist AFOI; however,these agents are associated with cardiovascular or respiratory adverse effects. Dexmedetomidine has been proposed as an alternative to facilitate AFOI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 68 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 41%
Psychology 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 75 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,432,988
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,987
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,163
of 322,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#190
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.