↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Routine hospital admission versus out-patient or home care in children at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
Title
Routine hospital admission versus out-patient or home care in children at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004099.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Clar, Norman Waugh, Sian Thomas

Abstract

In many places, children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus are admitted to hospital for metabolic stabilisation and training, even if they are not acutely ill. Out-patient or home based management of these children could avoid the stress associated with a hospital stay, could provide a more natural learning environment for the child and its family, and might reduce costs for both the health care system and the families.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 283 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 17%
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 58 20%
Unknown 76 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 12%
Psychology 20 7%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 82 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#16,108,967
of 23,905,714 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,257
of 12,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,632
of 75,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.