↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Routine hospital admission versus out-patient or home care in children at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Routine hospital admission versus out-patient or home care in children at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004099.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Clar, Norman Waugh, Sian Thomas

Abstract

In many places, children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus are admitted to hospital for metabolic stabilisation and training, even if they are not acutely ill. Out-patient or home based management of these children could avoid the stress associated with a hospital stay, could provide a more natural learning environment for the child and its family, and might reduce costs for both the health care system and the families.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 212 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 21%
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 35 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 13%
Psychology 16 7%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 39 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2014.
All research outputs
#10,023,987
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,201
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,324
of 239,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.