↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002073.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Devender Roberts, James P Neilson, Mark D Kilby, Simon Gates

Abstract

Twin-twin transfusion syndrome, a condition affecting monochorionic twin pregnancies, is associated with a high risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity. A number of treatments have been introduced to treat the condition but it is unclear which intervention improves maternal and fetal outcome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 186 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 20%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Other 13 7%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 38 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 7 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 45 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,745,444
of 16,540,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,455
of 11,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,993
of 260,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,540,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.