↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010397
Authors

Sattar JM Alshryda, Kai Tsang, Jalal Al‐Shryda, John Blenkinsopp, Akinwanda Adedapo, Richard Montgomery, James Mason

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2014.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,513
of 205,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#184
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.