| Title |
Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments versus pharmacological treatments for opioid detoxification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005031.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Amato, Silvia Minozzi, Marina Davoli, Simona Vecchi |
| Abstract |
Different pharmacological approaches aimed at opioid detoxification are effective. Nevertheless a majority of patients relapse to heroin use, and relapses are a substantial problem in the rehabilitation of heroin users. Some studies have suggested that the sorts of symptoms which are most distressing to addicts during detoxification are psychological rather than physiological symptoms associated with the withdrawal syndrome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 48 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 32% |
| Psychology | 24 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,587,263
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,449
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,311
of 125,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.