Title |
Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments versus pharmacological treatments for opioid detoxification
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005031.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura Amato, Silvia Minozzi, Marina Davoli, Simona Vecchi |
Abstract |
Different pharmacological approaches aimed at opioid detoxification are effective. Nevertheless a majority of patients relapse to heroin use, and relapses are a substantial problem in the rehabilitation of heroin users. Some studies have suggested that the sorts of symptoms which are most distressing to addicts during detoxification are psychological rather than physiological symptoms associated with the withdrawal syndrome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 196 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
Researcher | 25 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
Other | 39 | 20% |
Unknown | 52 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 31% |
Psychology | 24 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 9% |
Unknown | 58 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,471,259
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,754
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,913
of 136,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.