↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments versus pharmacological treatments for opioid detoxification

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments versus pharmacological treatments for opioid detoxification
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005031.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Amato, Silvia Minozzi, Marina Davoli, Simona Vecchi

Abstract

Different pharmacological approaches aimed at opioid detoxification are effective. Nevertheless a majority of patients relapse to heroin use, and relapses are a substantial problem in the rehabilitation of heroin users. Some studies have suggested that the sorts of symptoms which are most distressing to addicts during detoxification are psychological rather than physiological symptoms associated with the withdrawal syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 31%
Psychology 24 12%
Social Sciences 19 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 58 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,471,259
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,754
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,913
of 136,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.