↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments versus pharmacological treatments for opioid detoxification

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments versus pharmacological treatments for opioid detoxification
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005031.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Amato, Silvia Minozzi, Marina Davoli, Simona Vecchi

Abstract

Different pharmacological approaches aimed at opioid detoxification are effective. Nevertheless a majority of patients relapse to heroin use, and relapses are a substantial problem in the rehabilitation of heroin users. Some studies have suggested that the sorts of symptoms which are most distressing to addicts during detoxification are psychological rather than physiological symptoms associated with the withdrawal syndrome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 159 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 35%
Psychology 23 14%
Social Sciences 18 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 35 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,360,609
of 17,438,794 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,737
of 11,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,166
of 264,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#113
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,438,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.