↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Target payments in primary care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Target payments in primary care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1999
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000531
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Giuffrida, Toby Gosden, Frode Forland, Ivar Kristiansen, Michelle Sergison, Brenda Leese, Lone Pedersen, Matthew Sutton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 144 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 20%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Other 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 38%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 36 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,398,391
of 19,862,278 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,572
of 11,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,060
of 285,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#180
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,862,278 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.