| Title |
Target payments in primary care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000531 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Giuffrida, Toby Gosden, Frode Forland, Ivar Kristiansen, Michelle Sergison, Brenda Leese, Lone Pedersen, Matthew Sutton |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,418,795
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,936
of 12,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,044
of 37,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.