| Title |
Oral anticoagulants for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no previous history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001927.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria I Aguilar, Robert Hart |
| Abstract |
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke mediated by embolism of stasis-precipitated thrombi from the left atrial appendage. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,939,367
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,279
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,999
of 57,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.