↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Progestational agents for treating threatened or established preterm labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Progestational agents for treating threatened or established preterm labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006770.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin‐Lin Su, Miny Samuel, Yap‐Seng Chong

Abstract

Prematurity is not only the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality but is associated with long-term impairment. Studies of various tocolytic agents have shown mixed results with little effect in improving pregnancy duration and insufficient data to confirm a definite beneficial effect on neonatal morbidity or mortality. Progesterone is known to have an inhibitory effect on uterine contractility and is thought to play a key role in the maintenance of pregnancy until term.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 153 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 48 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 52 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,558,652
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,099
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,709
of 322,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.