| Title |
Pressure‐relieving devices for treating heel pressure ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005485.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth McGinnis, Nikki Stubbs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Bahrain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 45 | 22% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 52 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,430,941
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,658
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,921
of 331,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.