↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003282.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul O'Brien, Caroline C Marfleet

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 44%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Computer Science 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,064,874
of 21,738,040 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,728
of 12,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,150
of 286,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#211
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,738,040 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.