↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

5-Fluorouracil for glaucoma surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
5-Fluorouracil for glaucoma surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001132.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elspeth Green, Mark Wilkins, Catey Bunce, Richard Wormald

Abstract

Trabeculectomy is performed as a treatment for many types of glaucoma in an attempt to lower the intraocular pressure. The surgery involves creating a channel through the sclera, through which intraocular fluid can leave the eye. If scar tissue blocks the exit of the surgically created channel, intraocular pressure rises and the operation fails. Antimetabolites such as 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) are used to inhibit wound healing to prevent the conjunctiva scarring down on to the sclera. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2000, and previously updated in 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Other 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 28 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,146,443
of 16,722,463 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,873
of 11,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,966
of 191,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,722,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.