↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006442.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingeborg L Zijdenbos, Niek J de Wit, Geert J van der Heijden, Gregory Rubin, A Otto Quartero

Abstract

No consensus exists on the optimal treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Psychological treatments are increasingly advocated but their effectiveness is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 237 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 16%
Student > Bachelor 35 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Researcher 29 12%
Other 15 6%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 34%
Psychology 48 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 59 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,772,035
of 21,269,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,075
of 12,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,032
of 201,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,269,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.