↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aromatase inhibitors for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
Aromatase inhibitors for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010287.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Franik, Jan AM Kremer, Willianne LDM Nelen, Cindy Farquhar

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of infrequent periods (oligomenorrhoea) and absence of periods (amenorrhoea). It affects about 4% to 8% of women worldwide and often leads to anovulatory subfertility. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a novel class of drugs that were introduced for ovulation induction in 2001. Over the last ten years clinical trials have reached differing conclusions as to whether the AI letrozole is at least as effective as the first-line treatment clomiphene citrate (CC).

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 189 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 48 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,696,341
of 26,240,084 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,447
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,341
of 238,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,240,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.