↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006593.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashraf F Nabhan, Yaser A Abdelmoula

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 188 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 17%
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Postgraduate 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 30 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 35 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,225,132
of 14,780,221 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,455
of 11,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,116
of 265,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,780,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.