↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession‐type defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession‐type defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007161.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leandro Chambrone, Flávia Sukekava, Maurício G Araújo, Francisco E Pustiglioni, Luiz Armando Chambrone, Luiz A Lima

Abstract

Gingival recession is defined as the oral exposure of the root surface due to a displacement of the gingival margin apical to the cemento-enamel junction and it is regularly linked to the deterioration of dental aesthetics. Successful treatment of recession-type defects is based on the use of predictable periodontal plastic surgery (PPS) procedures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 22%
Student > Postgraduate 25 17%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 28 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,617,931
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,338
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,530
of 107,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.