The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession‐type defects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007161.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leandro Chambrone, Flávia Sukekava, Maurício G Araújo, Francisco E Pustiglioni, Luiz Armando Chambrone, Luiz A Lima |
| Abstract |
Gingival recession is defined as the oral exposure of the root surface due to a displacement of the gingival margin apical to the cemento-enamel junction and it is regularly linked to the deterioration of dental aesthetics. Successful treatment of recession-type defects is based on the use of predictable periodontal plastic surgery (PPS) procedures. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 60% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,617,931
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,338
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,530
of 107,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.