↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Artesunate plus pyronaridine for treating uncomplicatedPlasmodium falciparummalaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Artesunate plus pyronaridine for treating uncomplicatedPlasmodium falciparummalaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006404.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hasifa Bukirwa, B Unnikrishnan, Christine V Kramer, David Sinclair, Suma Nair, Prathap Tharyan

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that people with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria are treated using Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT). ACT combines three-days of a short-acting artemisinin derivative with a longer-acting antimalarial which has a different mode of action. Pyronaridine has been reported as an effective antimalarial over two decades of use in parts of Asia, and is currently being evaluated as a partner drug for artesunate.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 22 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,420,746
of 17,475,439 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,080
of 11,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,278
of 194,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,475,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.