↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic regimens for suspected early neonatal sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotic regimens for suspected early neonatal sepsis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004495.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward I Mtitimila, Richard WI Cooke

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 19 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#3,639,769
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,910
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,996
of 260,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.