| Title |
Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009740.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-Claude Lavoie, Jos H Verbeek, Manisha Pahwa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 4 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,883,604
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,205
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,572
of 222,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.