↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009015.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana C Ortiz, Álvaro N Atallah, Delcio Matos, Edina MK da Silva

Abstract

Ambulatory or outpatient anaesthesia is performed in patients who are discharged on the same day as their surgery. Perioperative complications such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative behavioural disturbances and cardiorespiratory complications should be minimized in ambulatory anaesthesia. The choice of anaesthetic agents and techniques can influence the occurrence of these complications and thus delay in discharge.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Other 15 9%
Other 41 23%
Unknown 32 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Psychology 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 38 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#3,757,222
of 18,780,663 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,385
of 11,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,951
of 197,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,780,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.