| Title |
Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009015.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana C Ortiz, Álvaro N Atallah, Delcio Matos, Edina MK da Silva |
| Abstract |
Ambulatory or outpatient anaesthesia is performed in patients who are discharged on the same day as their surgery. Perioperative complications such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative behavioural disturbances and cardiorespiratory complications should be minimized in ambulatory anaesthesia. The choice of anaesthetic agents and techniques can influence the occurrence of these complications and thus delay in discharge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Peru | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 69 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 77 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,809,871
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,950
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,558
of 322,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.