↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low‐back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
62 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
458 Mendeley
Title
Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low‐back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009169.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Safoora Ebadi, Nicholas Henschke, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, Ehsan Fallah, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Chronic non-specific low-back pain (LBP) has become one of the main causes of disability in the adult population around the world. Therapeutic ultrasound is frequently used by physiotherapists in the treatment of LBP and is one of the most widely used electro-physical agents in clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 452 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 83 18%
Student > Master 82 18%
Other 38 8%
Researcher 37 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Other 96 21%
Unknown 85 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 99 22%
Sports and Recreations 21 5%
Psychology 14 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Other 47 10%
Unknown 103 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#797,649
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,513
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,418
of 236,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.