↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Lifestyle intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or obese children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
41 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
724 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Lifestyle intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or obese children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009728.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Martin, David H Saunders, Susan D. Shenkin, John Sproule

Abstract

The prevalence of overweight and obesity in childhood and adolescence is high. Excessive body fat at a young age is likely to persist into adulthood and is associated with physical and psychosocial co-morbidities, as well as lower cognitive, school and later life achievement. Lifestyle changes, including reduced caloric intake, decreased sedentary behaviour and increased physical activity, are recommended for prevention and treatment of child and adolescent obesity. Evidence suggests that lifestyle interventions can benefit cognitive function and school achievement in children of normal weight. Similar beneficial effects may be seen in overweight or obese children and adolescents.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 724 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 702 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 163 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 15%
Researcher 101 14%
Student > Bachelor 74 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 6%
Other 140 19%
Unknown 92 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 200 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 101 14%
Sports and Recreations 73 10%
Psychology 70 10%
Social Sciences 58 8%
Other 96 13%
Unknown 126 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#627,188
of 15,604,031 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,713
of 11,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,568
of 224,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,604,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.