↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004112.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynley A Cook, Asha Pun, Maria F Gallo, Laureen M Lopez, Huib AAM Van Vliet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 16 13%
Other 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 40 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 45 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#711,398
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,439
of 12,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,144
of 226,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.