↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004112.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynley A Cook, Asha Pun, Maria F Gallo, Laureen M Lopez, Huib AAM Van Vliet

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 30 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,618,569
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,112
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,535
of 272,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#202
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.