↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaccines for preventing influenza in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Vaccines for preventing influenza in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001753.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Poonam Dharmaraj, Rosalind L Smyth

Abstract

Viral respiratory tract infections in people with cystic fibrosis have a deteriorating effect on their lung function and disease progression. Annual influenza vaccination is therefore commonly recommended for people with cystic fibrosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 31 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,298,423
of 18,382,898 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,261
of 11,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,717
of 198,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,382,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.