| Title |
Interventions based on the Theory of Mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008785.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sue Fletcher‐Watson, Fiona McConnell, Eirini Manola, Helen McConachie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 28% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Sweden | 4 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 64% |
| Scientists | 10 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 687 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 675 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 113 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 84 | 12% |
| Researcher | 70 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 48 | 7% |
| Other | 111 | 16% |
| Unknown | 169 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 196 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 49 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 70 | 10% |
| Unknown | 197 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#998,884
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,976
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,485
of 237,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.