↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Self management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
57 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
522 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
485 Mendeley
Title
Self management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002990.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marlies Zwerink, Marjolein Brusse-Keizer, Paul DLPM van der Valk, Gerhard A Zielhuis, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Job van der Palen, Peter A Frith, Tanja Effing

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 477 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 18%
Researcher 74 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 10%
Student > Bachelor 48 10%
Student > Postgraduate 27 6%
Other 79 16%
Unknown 123 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 86 18%
Psychology 29 6%
Social Sciences 24 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Other 45 9%
Unknown 138 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#555,290
of 24,594,795 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,031
of 12,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,027
of 228,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,594,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.