↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Self management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
70 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
439 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
Title
Self management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002990.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marlies Zwerink, Marjolein Brusse-Keizer, Paul DLPM van der Valk, Gerhard A Zielhuis, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Job van der Palen, Peter A Frith, Tanja Effing

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 419 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 81 19%
Researcher 69 16%
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Student > Postgraduate 27 6%
Other 71 17%
Unknown 88 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 78 18%
Psychology 27 6%
Social Sciences 24 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 101 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#448,590
of 19,181,681 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#947
of 11,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,069
of 201,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,181,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.