↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Self management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
54 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
541 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
494 Mendeley
Title
Self management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002990.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marlies Zwerink, Marjolein Brusse‐Keizer, Paul DLPM van der Valk, Gerhard A Zielhuis, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Job van der Palen, Peter A Frith, Tanja Effing

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 486 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 17%
Researcher 74 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 10%
Student > Bachelor 48 10%
Student > Postgraduate 27 5%
Other 84 17%
Unknown 128 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 17%
Psychology 28 6%
Social Sciences 24 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 145 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#607,624
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,097
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,347
of 237,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.