Self management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Marlies Zwerink, Marjolein Brusse-Keizer, Paul DLPM van der Valk, Gerhard A Zielhuis, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Job van der Palen, Peter A Frith, Tanja Effing
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of||2||4%|
|Members of the public||39||68%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||6||11%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||3||5%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||85||18%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||49||10%|
|Student > Bachelor||48||10%|
|Student > Postgraduate||27||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||153||32%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||86||18%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||10||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,594,795 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 228,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,594,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.