↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Potential harms of interventions for spinal metastatic disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Potential harms of interventions for spinal metastatic disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012724
Authors

Christian Carrwik, Hideki Murakami, Johan Willander, Yohan Robinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 23%
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Psychology 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Philosophy 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2017.
All research outputs
#16,784,715
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,726
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,587
of 326,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#199
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.