↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial interventions for premature ejaculation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Psychosocial interventions for premature ejaculation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008195.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Melnik, Stanley Althof, Álvaro N Atallah, Maria Eduarda dos Santos Puga, Sidney Glina, Rachel Riera

Abstract

Premature ejaculation (PE) is a very common sexual dysfunction among patients, and with varying prevalence estimates ranging from 3% to 20%. Although psychological issues are present in most patients with premature PE, as a cause or as a consequence, research on the effects of psychological approaches for PE has in general not been controlled or randomised and is lacking in long-term follow up.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 163 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 52 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 35%
Psychology 20 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 55 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,152,345
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,817
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,547
of 131,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.