The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||26||96%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||4%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||71||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||64||14%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||41||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||159||34%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||60||13%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||22||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 230,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.