↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004943.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shantini Paranjothy, James D Griffiths, Hannah K Broughton, Gillian ML Gyte, Heather C Brown, Jane Thomas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 140 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 9 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 46 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Psychology 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 48 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,211,848
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,149
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,361
of 323,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.