↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sodium channel blockers for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Sodium channel blockers for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005087.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elinor F Burrows, Kevin W Southern, Peadar G Noone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 33 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 38 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,712,309
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,210
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,953
of 228,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#197
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.