↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
427 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
533 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005182.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liam G Glynn, Andrew W Murphy, Susan M Smith, Knut Schroeder, Tom Fahey

Abstract

Patients with high blood pressure (hypertension) in the community frequently fail to meet treatment goals - a condition labelled as "uncontrolled" hypertension. The optimal way to organize and deliver care to hypertensive patients has not been clearly identified.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 512 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 17%
Researcher 79 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 13%
Student > Bachelor 64 12%
Student > Postgraduate 34 6%
Other 129 24%
Unknown 63 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 219 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 97 18%
Social Sciences 27 5%
Psychology 25 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 2%
Other 67 13%
Unknown 85 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#486,416
of 21,436,792 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#968
of 12,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,005
of 205,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,436,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.