| Title |
Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005182.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam G Glynn, Andrew W Murphy, Susan M Smith, Knut Schroeder, Tom Fahey |
| Abstract |
Patients with high blood pressure (hypertension) in the community frequently fail to meet treatment goals - a condition labelled as "uncontrolled" hypertension. The optimal way to organize and deliver care to hypertensive patients has not been clearly identified. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 549 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 528 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 93 | 17% |
| Researcher | 76 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 122 | 22% |
| Unknown | 86 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 221 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 96 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 5% |
| Psychology | 25 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 56 | 10% |
| Unknown | 111 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 259. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#125,531
of 23,702,491 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#236
of 12,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293
of 108,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,702,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.